The Hunger Games

image via upcoming-movies.com

The Hunger Games, directed by Gary Ross, is no exact adaptation of the book from page to screen. Although purists may be miffed by some elements that had to be left out of the film version, Ross’s film captures the essence of the book, faithful in all the areas where it matters most. The film complements Suzanne Collins’ book in a mostly straightforward way, but with an occasional flash of insight. It can be likened to good illustrations in a book: the film offers a wonderful visualization of the story that is not complete in and of itself, but which instead simultaneously provides both a complementary vision of, and a new lens through which to view, the book.

First off, Jennifer Lawrence is perfect. Although she’s forced to externalize much of what was internalized in the book, her acting is not histrionic, but subtle. She plays Katniss with the contradictory fierceness and tenderness that renders her character so uniquely captivating. Josh Hutcherson, not given quite enough screen time or character development as Peeta, makes up for his occasional lack of subtlety with his winsomeness. Liam Hemsworth has a strong presence in the few scenes he is in.

As is always the case in book to film adaptations, particularly in books with first person narration, a certain degree of character development falls to the wayside, most keenly felt in the development of Katniss and Peeta’s relationship. So much of this was internalized and developed chiefly through conversations and looks in the book that only a fraction made it to the movie. While disappointing, we can only hope that two such well-cast leads are given the chance to further develop their characters in the upcoming films.

Ross and his team visually read between the lines in many design elements, making this a particularly familiar, historically grounded, post-apocalyptic dystopian society. He develops beautifully the cultural and historical undertones of an Appalachian-like region as the probable setting for the story.

The cinematography, with its jerky, often handheld camera, is obviously inspired by the reality TV that the film both critiques and often seems to takes its stylistic cue from. This can either be seen as annoying or as an interesting stylistic choice given the subject matter. For me it was both.

Heavy silences often remind us of the weightiness of the events depicted. Music is well used throughout to simply enhance what is happening onscreen, instead of being utilized to dictate emotions the viewer is supposed to be feeling. Although it is not always the case, the lack of music in many critical scenes is notable and refreshing. The film tastefully shows how serious and jarring the deaths of these children are, without adding an element of gratuitous violence. Such thoughtfully accomplished visualization of so many tributes’ deaths makes us realize the gravity and disturbing quality of something I’m afraid even I was occasionally guilty of breezing over as action when reading.

At the same time, these deaths could have been made more jolting than they were. Aside from glimpses of desperation, many of the adolescent villains are left relatively undeveloped (as in the book), turning many of them into teenage killing machines without the benefit of the backstory that leads us to instantly sympathize with Katniss and Peeta. With the possible exception of Cato, the “Careers” and other of the less sympathetic tributes are thus somewhat dehumanized, even more for the film viewer than for the reader. Perhaps we should be just as jarred by who is doing the killing in these cases as the fact of who is being killed.

The film also incorporates elements of the series that were not revealed until the second book, thus tying events together, whetting the audience’s appetite for the next film, and creating what will be a very cohesive final filmic trilogy. The film is not perfect, but as far as inaugural filmic installments in popular series go, this one gives us much to look forward to.

For all those that see it, the film is a good reminder as to what exactly it is about this story that has captured the imaginations of so many. The story’s themes blur (or perhaps reveal?) the lines between typical Young Adult fiction themes and those archetypal themes of guilt, betrayal, courage, the value of life, and every kind of love—sacrificial, unconditional, unrequited, wondering… Such heady themes are intertwined into a story that also has allusions of the literary and historical kind (e.g. Romeo and Juliet, Greek mythology, the Roman gladiatorial games), and social critique à la reality TV and our culture’s edging towards violence as entertainment. Perhaps such elements of timeless relevancy are what give this series their almost mythic quality for so many—boys and girls, young and old.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “The Hunger Games

  1. I was really hoping you would write a “review” on The Hunger Games. I haven’t seen it yet but I read all the books and LOVED them! After reading this I think I might have a better appreciation for the movie and not be so hard on the differences it has from the book! I hope you are enjoying NY!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s